Key Takeaways
- • Madrona managing director Matt McIlwain urged Washington voters to support Initiative 645 and repeal the state income tax, arguing the state has a spending problem rather than a revenue problem.
- • McIlwain said Washington's biennial revenue budget grew from about $26 billion in 2010 to about $80 billion today, and annual per-student spending rose from just over $10,000 to more than $20,000.
- • Host Jake Skorheim cited Seattle Public Schools data showing the district's budget rose from $611 million in 2014 to nearly $1.2 billion in 2025 while enrollment was roughly flat at about 48,500 students.
- • Host Spike O'Neill challenged the repeal argument, asking where schools could cut spending without harming maintenance, utilities, teacher pay, and essential services.
- • McIlwain warned that an income tax initially aimed at wealthy residents could eventually reach a broader share of households, though the interview did not establish that this would occur.
Summary
Matt McIlwain, managing director of Seattle venture capital firm Madrona, argued on "The Jake and Spike Show" on KIRO Newsradio that Washington should rein in spending rather than adopt an income tax, urging voters to support Initiative 645. "We really have a spending problem in the state," McIlwain said. "We don't have a revenue problem."
McIlwain contended that Washington's existing tax system has generated substantial revenue while supporting investment and job creation. He framed his opposition around economic opportunity, arguing that an income tax would discourage the risk-taking that creates jobs and new products. He pointed to voters' 2010 rejection of a state income tax and contrasted warnings at that time that insufficient funding would follow with subsequent revenue growth. According to McIlwain, the biennial revenue budget has grown from approximately $26 billion to about $80 billion. He credited sales taxes and the business and occupation tax with funding state services.
Spike O'Neill questioned how rejecting an income tax would address ongoing education and healthcare funding concerns, asking, "How do you solve this deficit?" McIlwain responded that the state should examine its spending and the outcomes it produces, citing per-student spending growth from a little more than $10,000 in 2010 to more than $20,000 today, and calling for greater accountability for educational results. McIlwain identified administrative staffing as an area to scrutinize and argued for directing more money into classrooms and technology-based instruction. O'Neill pressed for specific reductions, noting that schools still face costs for maintenance, utilities, and competitive teacher pay.
Jake Skorheim backed the argument with Seattle Public Schools figures, stating that the district's budget increased from $611 million in 2014 to nearly $1.2 billion in 2025, while enrollment moved from 48,529 to 48,570 students over the same period. He also said the district added about 1,000 staff members. McIlwain said taxpayers are frustrated with the results of increased government spending.
McIlwain also predicted that an income tax initially targeting wealthy residents would eventually expand to a broader share of Washington households, presenting this as another reason for repeal. Jake endorsed the recommendation, and Spike encouraged listeners to read McIlwain's GeekWire opinion piece, which also addresses potential effects on philanthropic donations.
McIlwain contended that Washington's existing tax system has generated substantial revenue while supporting investment and job creation. He framed his opposition around economic opportunity, arguing that an income tax would discourage the risk-taking that creates jobs and new products. He pointed to voters' 2010 rejection of a state income tax and contrasted warnings at that time that insufficient funding would follow with subsequent revenue growth. According to McIlwain, the biennial revenue budget has grown from approximately $26 billion to about $80 billion. He credited sales taxes and the business and occupation tax with funding state services.
Spike O'Neill questioned how rejecting an income tax would address ongoing education and healthcare funding concerns, asking, "How do you solve this deficit?" McIlwain responded that the state should examine its spending and the outcomes it produces, citing per-student spending growth from a little more than $10,000 in 2010 to more than $20,000 today, and calling for greater accountability for educational results. McIlwain identified administrative staffing as an area to scrutinize and argued for directing more money into classrooms and technology-based instruction. O'Neill pressed for specific reductions, noting that schools still face costs for maintenance, utilities, and competitive teacher pay.
Jake Skorheim backed the argument with Seattle Public Schools figures, stating that the district's budget increased from $611 million in 2014 to nearly $1.2 billion in 2025, while enrollment moved from 48,529 to 48,570 students over the same period. He also said the district added about 1,000 staff members. McIlwain said taxpayers are frustrated with the results of increased government spending.
McIlwain also predicted that an income tax initially targeting wealthy residents would eventually expand to a broader share of Washington households, presenting this as another reason for repeal. Jake endorsed the recommendation, and Spike encouraged listeners to read McIlwain's GeekWire opinion piece, which also addresses potential effects on philanthropic donations.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.