Key Takeaways
- • AustralianSuper, managing over $280 billion in retirement savings for 3 million members, has backed a new benchmark definition for "emerging assets" under Australia's Your Future, Your Super (YFYS) performance test regulations, proposing that emerging assets be defined by J-curve return profiles characteristic of venture capital, greenfield renewable energy, and housing developments.
- • The fund challenged the absence of an "industry-agreed definition" of growth and defensive assets within the YFYS framework, signaling concerns that existing benchmark categories may not adequately capture alternative investment strategies aligned with long-term member outcomes.
- • AustralianSuper's submission to Treasury on the Superannuation Performance Test Regulations 2023 emphasizes the fund's long-standing support for consistent, universal performance measurement while advocating for regulatory flexibility that accommodates emerging asset classes without compromising long-term investment incentives.
- • The proposed emerging assets benchmark represents an attempt to address criticism that YFYS rules risk incentivizing short-term, benchmark-hugging behavior rather than genuine long-term value creation for superannuation members.
Summary
In its formal submission to Treasury, AustralianSuper proposed that emerging assets should be defined by their characteristic J-curve return profile—a pattern common to venture capital, greenfield renewable energy projects, and housing developments. This definition aims to create regulatory clarity around alternative investment categories that generate returns through multi-year capital deployment rather than near-term cash distributions, a distinction critical for funds pursuing genuinely long-term investment strategies.
The fund's support for this benchmark innovation reflects broader concerns about existing YFYS performance test categories. AustralianSuper explicitly criticized the current framework for lacking an "industry-agreed definition" of growth and defensive asset classifications, a gap that may force funds into performance measurement categories misaligned with their actual investment mandates. This definitional ambiguity creates regulatory risk for funds deploying capital into emerging asset classes while simultaneously penalizing them under performance tests calibrated to traditional equity and fixed-income benchmarks.
AustralianSuper's position underscores a central tension in Australia's superannuation regulatory environment: balancing the stated policy objective of consistent, comparable fund performance measurement against the practical reality that long-term, capital-intensive investments—particularly in renewable energy and venture capital—operate on multi-year return cycles incompatible with short-term benchmarking. Academic and industry commentary has flagged that YFYS rules risk creating perverse incentives toward "short-term, benchmark-hugging" behavior, potentially deterring superannuation funds from illiquid, high-impact allocations that could materially enhance member outcomes over 20- to 40-year accumulation horizons.
By supporting the emerging assets benchmark, AustralianSuper positions itself as advocating for regulatory architecture that accommodates alternative capital deployment while maintaining the fund governance and transparency standards essential to the superannuation system's integrity.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.