AlphaMaven AlphaMaven

Akin Attorneys Author Reuters Article on MNPI and Prediction Markets

Reported by Akingump
Aug 17, 2026· 2 min read
Save Post LinkedIn Email
Key Takeaways
  • • Akin Gump white collar defense partners Michael Asaro and Jack Murphy published a Reuters article examining material non-public information (MNPI) regulatory implications in prediction markets, a jurisdiction gap emerging as these markets grow in prominence.
  • • The article addresses compliance challenges companies face when MNPI intersects with prediction market activity, highlighting a critical area where regulatory frameworks remain underdeveloped.
  • • The piece titled "Everything is MNPI — prediction markets and the problem of immaterial nonpublic information" provides institutional investors and compliance officers with guidance on defining MNPI boundaries in alternative trading venues.
  • • As prediction markets expand in scale and participation, the regulatory ambiguity around MNPI disclosure and trading conduct creates operational risk for institutional participants and financial institutions.
Summary
Reuters published an article co-authored by Michael Asaro, a partner in Akin Gump's white collar defense and government investigations practice, and Jack Murphy, senior counsel at the firm, examining the intersection of material non-public information (MNPI) regulations and prediction market activity. The August 14, 2026 piece, titled "Everything is MNPI — prediction markets and the problem of immaterial nonpublic information," addresses an emerging compliance challenge facing companies and institutional investors as prediction markets gain traction in financial markets.

The article analyzes what constitutes MNPI in prediction market contexts and explores the regulatory compliance obligations companies should implement. Prediction markets—platforms enabling participants to trade contracts based on outcomes of future events—have grown in popularity and liquidity, yet existing securities law and insider trading frameworks provide limited specific guidance on how MNPI rules apply to these venues. The ambiguity creates potential liability exposure for institutional traders, employees with access to nonpublic corporate information, and firms managing trading risk across multiple asset classes.

Asaro and Murphy's analysis serves as a resource for alternative investment professionals, hedge fund managers, and compliance teams navigating uncertain regulatory terrain. Their examination of MNPI boundaries in prediction markets provides practical framework guidance during a period when regulatory agencies have not issued comprehensive position statements on trading conduct in these venues. The article underscores the need for institutional participants to develop internal policies governing employee and trader participation in prediction markets to mitigate insider trading and disclosure violations.

Go deeper than the headline

Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.

Start your free 7-day trial

Sources

1 outlet

AlphaMaven summarised this story from the reporting below. Each link opens the original article.

Akingump Akin Attorneys Author Reuters Article on MNPI and Prediction Markets