Key Takeaways
- • Blue Owl co-CEOs Doug Ostrover and Marc Lipschultz, in a Semafor "Compound Interest" interview with Liz Hoffman and Rohan Goswami, argued that the private credit selloff reflects a gap between perception and performance, with the asset class performing well.
- • Ostrover said Blue Owl's semi-liquid credit product has returned an excess of 9%, which he said is roughly 600 basis points above a public high-yield fund and 300 basis points above a loan fund.
- • Lipschultz said direct lending accounts for about one-third of Blue Owl's business, while its fastest-growing unit is real assets, and that problematic loan levels have not changed materially this year.
- • Ostrover said about 98% of Blue Owl's revenue comes from management fees and that operating margins have been steady at 58% to 58.5%.
- • Both executives rejected the idea that the "semi-liquid" label or adviser incentives explain investor stress, attributing recent pressure to growth slowing amid credit concerns and media coverage.
Summary
Blue Owl co-CEOs Doug Ostrover and Marc Lipschultz used a Semafor "Compound Interest" interview, hosted by business and finance editor Liz Hoffman and Rohan Goswami, to address investor redemption pressure and skepticism toward private credit. Hoffman described the situation as a slow-moving run on a large lender, with Blue Owl and peers including Blackstone, Apollo and Ares limiting redemptions because fund interests cannot be sold quickly. She noted that Blue Owl has kept a low profile in recent months.
Ostrover argued that there is a "big disconnect" between private credit's performance and market perception. He cited the collapse of First Brands, an auto parts company that he said did not finance in the direct market, as a watershed event that the industry should have explained more proactively. He described the strategy as taking the syndicated loan and making it a better, safer product with higher returns, and said the firm expects strong results over the next 18 months.
Lipschultz said direct lending represents about a third of Blue Owl's business and that real assets is its fastest-growing segment. He argued that rising rates and economic uncertainty are conditions in which direct lending tends to perform, and said institutions are moving into the asset class. He also said problematic loans have not changed materially through 2026.
On the wealth channel, Goswami noted that growth was partly driven by non-institutional investors sold semi-liquid products, often through financial advisers. Ostrover said the products are delivering on their stated promise, citing returns above 9% for the credit product, and that investors should expect periods when redemptions must wait. Lipschultz rejected the suggestion that adviser incentives drive placement, saying that manager selection and adviser education matter. Ostrover also said roughly 98% of revenue comes from management fees and margins have held at 58% to 58.5%, while slowing growth reflected credit concerns and media coverage.
Ostrover argued that there is a "big disconnect" between private credit's performance and market perception. He cited the collapse of First Brands, an auto parts company that he said did not finance in the direct market, as a watershed event that the industry should have explained more proactively. He described the strategy as taking the syndicated loan and making it a better, safer product with higher returns, and said the firm expects strong results over the next 18 months.
Lipschultz said direct lending represents about a third of Blue Owl's business and that real assets is its fastest-growing segment. He argued that rising rates and economic uncertainty are conditions in which direct lending tends to perform, and said institutions are moving into the asset class. He also said problematic loans have not changed materially through 2026.
On the wealth channel, Goswami noted that growth was partly driven by non-institutional investors sold semi-liquid products, often through financial advisers. Ostrover said the products are delivering on their stated promise, citing returns above 9% for the credit product, and that investors should expect periods when redemptions must wait. Lipschultz rejected the suggestion that adviser incentives drive placement, saying that manager selection and adviser education matter. Ostrover also said roughly 98% of revenue comes from management fees and margins have held at 58% to 58.5%, while slowing growth reflected credit concerns and media coverage.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.