Key Takeaways
- • AlphaSimplex researchers Kathryn M. Kaminski (Chief Research Strategist) and Yingshan Zhao (Research Scientist) analyze the historical performance of trend-following strategies during market crises versus corrections across both equity and fixed income markets.
- • The research examines whether managed futures strategies deliver consistent "crisis alpha"—excess returns during market dislocations—and establishes a framework for distinguishing between corrective drawdowns and systemic crisis events.
- • AlphaSimplex, operating as a subadviser to mutual funds, ETFs, and Virtus Global Funds through Virtus Investment Partners, positions trend-following strategies as portfolio diversifiers with differentiated behavior during market stress periods.
- • The analysis addresses investor expectations around managed futures performance volatility, emphasizing the importance of understanding cyclical drawdowns versus true crisis-driven alpha generation.
Summary
AlphaSimplex, a Virtus Investment Partners subadviser, has published research examining the performance dynamics of trend-following and managed futures strategies during market dislocations. The research, authored by Chief Research Strategist Kathryn M. Kaminski and Research Scientist Yingshan Zhao, directly addresses a critical question for institutional investors: whether managed futures deliver consistent outperformance during crises, or whether performance varies significantly based on market conditions.
The core analysis distinguishes between market corrections—routine pullbacks within established trends—and true crises, which represent systemic breaks in market structure. This distinction is essential for portfolio managers evaluating managed futures as crisis hedges. The researchers examine performance across both equity and fixed income markets, providing a comprehensive view of how trend-following strategies have historically behaved during different stress regimes. The work builds on AlphaSimplex's ongoing research into market cycle dynamics, drawdown management, and the "patience premium" required to maintain exposure to managed futures through volatility periods.
For institutional investors and hedge fund managers, this research carries implications for portfolio construction and risk budgeting. Managed futures strategies are typically positioned as alternative sources of alpha with low correlation to traditional assets. However, performance during stress periods has not been uniformly positive, prompting the need for realistic expectations and granular performance analysis. AlphaSimplex's examination of crisis versus correction dynamics provides evidence-based guidance for distinguishing between temporary underperformance and genuine diversification benefit.
The research is part of AlphaSimplex's broader intellectual output, which includes prior analyses on market cycle management, managed futures index replication methodology, and trade-war-related market dynamics. For family offices, hedge funds, and other sophisticated investors evaluating alternative allocation strategies, this work offers quantitative perspective on whether managed futures warrant inclusion as diversifiers and under what market regimes they deliver measurable value.
The core analysis distinguishes between market corrections—routine pullbacks within established trends—and true crises, which represent systemic breaks in market structure. This distinction is essential for portfolio managers evaluating managed futures as crisis hedges. The researchers examine performance across both equity and fixed income markets, providing a comprehensive view of how trend-following strategies have historically behaved during different stress regimes. The work builds on AlphaSimplex's ongoing research into market cycle dynamics, drawdown management, and the "patience premium" required to maintain exposure to managed futures through volatility periods.
For institutional investors and hedge fund managers, this research carries implications for portfolio construction and risk budgeting. Managed futures strategies are typically positioned as alternative sources of alpha with low correlation to traditional assets. However, performance during stress periods has not been uniformly positive, prompting the need for realistic expectations and granular performance analysis. AlphaSimplex's examination of crisis versus correction dynamics provides evidence-based guidance for distinguishing between temporary underperformance and genuine diversification benefit.
The research is part of AlphaSimplex's broader intellectual output, which includes prior analyses on market cycle management, managed futures index replication methodology, and trade-war-related market dynamics. For family offices, hedge funds, and other sophisticated investors evaluating alternative allocation strategies, this work offers quantitative perspective on whether managed futures warrant inclusion as diversifiers and under what market regimes they deliver measurable value.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.