Key Takeaways
- • CalPERS' $298-billion pension plan eliminated its $4-billion hedge fund allocation in fall 2020, citing high costs, complexity, and inability to meaningfully impact returns relative to the plan's scale—a decision that prompted widespread client reassessment among other plan sponsors.
- • Hedge fund allocation decisions hinge on investor expectations and program structure rather than plan size; smaller plans are increasingly entering the hedge fund space despite CalPERS' exit, with major Canadian pension plans (OMERS, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan) already substantially invested.
- • Hedge funds serve as a tool to address equity and interest-rate risk exposure through non-traditional strategies (long/short, relative value, event-driven), offering return profiles distinct from traditional asset classes—though fees and complexity remain structural barriers for smaller allocators.
- • Dave McMillan (Mercer CIO for hedge funds) emphasizes that hedge funds function as a flexible strategy framework rather than a standalone asset class, with performance outcomes dependent on how plan sponsors structure and deploy the allocation.
Summary
The decision by the California Public Employees' Retirement System to divest its $4-billion hedge fund program triggered significant reassessment across the institutional investor community. CalPERS, managing $298 billion in assets, concluded that hedge fund holdings—originally deployed to enhance returns—could not materially move the needle on a plan of its magnitude. While fees and operational complexity factored into the decision, interim chief investment officer Ted Eliopoulos signaled that scale economics and expected return contribution were primary drivers. The announcement prompted numerous inquiries from other plan sponsors seeking guidance on whether similar exits made sense for their own portfolios.
However, expert analysis suggests CalPERS' decision does not necessarily signal a broader institutional retreat from hedge fund exposure. Dave McMillan, partner and CIO for hedge funds at Mercer, notes that the strategic value of hedge fund allocations depends fundamentally on investor objectives and program construction rather than absolute asset size. He characterizes hedge funds not as a discrete asset class but as a flexible strategic framework capable of addressing specific risk exposures—particularly equity and interest-rate risks—through alternative return profiles unavailable in traditional markets.
According to McMillan, hedge fund strategies including long/short equity, relative value arbitrage, and event-driven approaches generate distinctly different return characteristics compared to conventional equity and fixed-income allocations. This risk-mitigation function continues to attract smaller pension plans into the space, even as CalPERS withdrew. Major Canadian institutional investors including OMERS and the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan have maintained substantial hedge fund allocations, demonstrating sustained confidence in the strategy among large-cap plan sponsors.
The divergence between CalPERS' exit and broader institutional adoption underscores a nuanced market dynamic: plan size interacts with fee structures, return expectations, and strategic objectives to determine hedge fund utility. Smaller plans may find hedge fund exposure more strategically valuable—relative to capital base—than systems managing hundreds of billions, where incremental return contributions become mathematically immaterial. Cost and complexity concerns remain barriers for smaller allocators, yet the expanding participation of mid-sized plans suggests these obstacles are surmountable when aligned with clear risk-management objectives.
However, expert analysis suggests CalPERS' decision does not necessarily signal a broader institutional retreat from hedge fund exposure. Dave McMillan, partner and CIO for hedge funds at Mercer, notes that the strategic value of hedge fund allocations depends fundamentally on investor objectives and program construction rather than absolute asset size. He characterizes hedge funds not as a discrete asset class but as a flexible strategic framework capable of addressing specific risk exposures—particularly equity and interest-rate risks—through alternative return profiles unavailable in traditional markets.
According to McMillan, hedge fund strategies including long/short equity, relative value arbitrage, and event-driven approaches generate distinctly different return characteristics compared to conventional equity and fixed-income allocations. This risk-mitigation function continues to attract smaller pension plans into the space, even as CalPERS withdrew. Major Canadian institutional investors including OMERS and the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan have maintained substantial hedge fund allocations, demonstrating sustained confidence in the strategy among large-cap plan sponsors.
The divergence between CalPERS' exit and broader institutional adoption underscores a nuanced market dynamic: plan size interacts with fee structures, return expectations, and strategic objectives to determine hedge fund utility. Smaller plans may find hedge fund exposure more strategically valuable—relative to capital base—than systems managing hundreds of billions, where incremental return contributions become mathematically immaterial. Cost and complexity concerns remain barriers for smaller allocators, yet the expanding participation of mid-sized plans suggests these obstacles are surmountable when aligned with clear risk-management objectives.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.