Key Takeaways
- • In December 2007 Warren Buffett bet that a low-cost S&P 500 index fund would beat a selection of hedge funds over 2008-2017, and the index returned 125.8% (about 8.5% a year) over the period, per the primary source.
- • The five funds of funds selected by Protege Partners' Ted Seides returned between 2.8% and roughly 8.5% over the decade, according to the publisher summary (the upper bound is truncated in the source).
- • The bet's outcome offers a benchmark for allocators weighing active hedge fund fees against passive index exposure.
- • The primary source provides only a publisher summary and page navigation, so detailed fund-level performance and post-2017 index figures are not available from this material.
Summary
The result has been widely cited as a clear verdict on the cost and performance of active hedge fund allocation during a decade that included the post-financial-crisis recovery. Funds of funds layer an additional fee structure on top of underlying manager fees, a dynamic that the bet was designed to highlight.
The headline also references what the S&P 500 has done since the wager concluded. The source material available for this summary does not include those post-2017 index figures, so this summary does not attribute any performance data beyond the 2008-2017 window.
Adjacent industry coverage in the same briefing addresses allocation trends, including DACH institutions lifting alternatives to 32.3% of portfolios as hedge funds regain interest, and the consolidation of capital toward large multi-strategy platforms. These items are separate stories and are not part of the Buffett bet outcome.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.