Key Takeaways
- • The University of Texas Investment Management Co. is restructuring hedge fund compensation using a "1-or-30" fee model designed to align manager incentives with endowment performance and reduce conflicts of interest in fee structures.
- • Approximately 70 percent of the endowment's hedge fund assets have already adopted fee structures aligned with the endowment's philosophy, demonstrating significant market adoption of the new approach.
- • Carlson Capital was the first hedge fund to agree to the revised fee arrangement, establishing a precedent for other managers seeking to continue managing endowment capital.
- • Texas Teachers' CIO Jase Auby reports that new fee models now apply to around two-thirds of assets under management, indicating growing industry compliance with pressure to reform traditional "2-and-20" compensation structures.
- • The initiative addresses a broader investor movement toward "cash hurdles" models where hedge funds charge fees only on returns exceeding market benchmarks, shifting compensation away from asset-based charges deemed to compensate for "skill-less" performance.
Summary
The University of Texas Investment Management Co. is leading a significant reform effort in hedge fund compensation through implementation of a "1-or-30" fee model that fundamentally restructures how managers are paid. This initiative represents an institutional investor pushback against traditional hedge fund fee structures that critics argue misalign incentives and generate fees regardless of performance quality. According to available reporting, the endowment views this approach as establishing "fair and just" fees that tie compensation more directly to investment outcomes.
The restructuring has achieved substantial traction across the endowment's portfolio. Approximately 70 percent of the endowment's hedge fund assets currently operate under fee structures aligned with the endowment's philosophy, reflecting strong manager compliance with the new model. Carlson Capital distinguished itself as the first hedge fund to accept the revised fee arrangement, effectively setting a template for other managers. Texas Teachers' CIO Jase Auby confirmed that new fee models now apply to approximately two-thirds of assets under management, demonstrating that this approach extends beyond the University of Texas to influence the broader institutional investor base.
The broader context reflects growing institutional investor dissatisfaction with traditional hedge fund compensation. Industry observers and investor groups have begun advocating for "cash hurdles" models where hedge funds earn performance fees only on returns that exceed market benchmarks, effectively eliminating compensation for performance that lacks genuine investment skill. This shift addresses a fundamental concern: that asset-based fee structures incentivize growth in assets under management rather than superior performance, potentially disadvantaging long-term investor returns.
The endowment's approach signals that institutional capital—particularly from large, sophisticated investors—is prepared to demand material changes to hedge fund economics. By demonstrating that meaningful asset bases can transition to alternative fee structures, the University of Texas and Texas Teachers are establishing a new market standard that other endowments and institutional investors are likely to reference in their own manager negotiations. This creates structural pressure across the hedge fund industry to adopt more performance-aligned compensation models.
The restructuring has achieved substantial traction across the endowment's portfolio. Approximately 70 percent of the endowment's hedge fund assets currently operate under fee structures aligned with the endowment's philosophy, reflecting strong manager compliance with the new model. Carlson Capital distinguished itself as the first hedge fund to accept the revised fee arrangement, effectively setting a template for other managers. Texas Teachers' CIO Jase Auby confirmed that new fee models now apply to approximately two-thirds of assets under management, demonstrating that this approach extends beyond the University of Texas to influence the broader institutional investor base.
The broader context reflects growing institutional investor dissatisfaction with traditional hedge fund compensation. Industry observers and investor groups have begun advocating for "cash hurdles" models where hedge funds earn performance fees only on returns that exceed market benchmarks, effectively eliminating compensation for performance that lacks genuine investment skill. This shift addresses a fundamental concern: that asset-based fee structures incentivize growth in assets under management rather than superior performance, potentially disadvantaging long-term investor returns.
The endowment's approach signals that institutional capital—particularly from large, sophisticated investors—is prepared to demand material changes to hedge fund economics. By demonstrating that meaningful asset bases can transition to alternative fee structures, the University of Texas and Texas Teachers are establishing a new market standard that other endowments and institutional investors are likely to reference in their own manager negotiations. This creates structural pressure across the hedge fund industry to adopt more performance-aligned compensation models.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.