Key Takeaways
- • Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman announced a $227.5 million settlement with hedge funds over alleged mismanagement of $1.2 billion in Kentucky Retirement Systems funds, but a group of state workers (Tier 3 Plaintiffs) argue only $82.5 million represents new money while $145 million is a return of previously held reserves.
- • The Tier 3 Plaintiffs claim contingency fee attorneys could receive up to $45.5 million (approximately 20% of the settlement), which they characterize as disproportionate relative to the actual recovery.
- • A separate lawsuit initiated by state workers in 2021 alleges hedge funds and certain KRS officials engaged in high-risk, secretive hedge fund investments beginning in 2011 that resulted in significant losses.
- • The Tier 3 Plaintiffs filed a 52-page motion in Franklin Circuit Court opposing the settlement's terms while requesting permission for their independent case against the hedge funds to proceed.
- • The dispute centers on the scope and value of recovery, with workers' representatives arguing the Attorney General's settlement undercompensates the pension system relative to attorney compensation.
Summary
Kentucky's pension funds face competing recovery strategies following a proposed $227.5 million settlement with major hedge funds over alleged mismanagement dating to 2011. Attorney General Russell Coleman announced the agreement on January 8, 2025, resolving a long-running lawsuit that claimed hedge funds and certain Kentucky Retirement Systems officials invested $1.2 billion in secretive, high-risk hedge fund positions that subsequently deteriorated in value.
However, state workers represented by the Tier 3 Plaintiffs have aggressively challenged the settlement's structure and adequacy. In a motion filed in Franklin Circuit Court, the workers' representatives disputed the characterization of the recovery, arguing that only $82.5 million represents new money to the pension system. The remaining $145 million, they contend, consists of funds already held in reserve by the Prisma-managed investment fund and therefore cannot be credited as fresh recovery. This distinction carries significant implications for the apparent settlement value presented to the public and stakeholders.
The workers' group also highlighted the compensation structure for private attorneys retained by the Attorney General's office, noting that contingency fee arrangements could yield approximately $45.5 million—roughly 20 percent of the total settlement amount. The Tier 3 Plaintiffs characterized this attorney compensation as a "multi-million dollar bonanza" that far exceeds what they describe as a "pittance" for the pension funds themselves, particularly given their recalculation of actual new recovery.
Despite their objections to the settlement's terms, the Tier 3 Plaintiffs indicated willingness to permit court approval of the Attorney General's agreement on the condition that their separate 2021 lawsuit against the hedge funds proceeds independently. The workers' representatives framed their position as allowing the court to "approve this charade if it can stomach it," suggesting fundamental disagreement with both the settlement's structure and its characterization as a major victory for Kentucky's pension system.
However, state workers represented by the Tier 3 Plaintiffs have aggressively challenged the settlement's structure and adequacy. In a motion filed in Franklin Circuit Court, the workers' representatives disputed the characterization of the recovery, arguing that only $82.5 million represents new money to the pension system. The remaining $145 million, they contend, consists of funds already held in reserve by the Prisma-managed investment fund and therefore cannot be credited as fresh recovery. This distinction carries significant implications for the apparent settlement value presented to the public and stakeholders.
The workers' group also highlighted the compensation structure for private attorneys retained by the Attorney General's office, noting that contingency fee arrangements could yield approximately $45.5 million—roughly 20 percent of the total settlement amount. The Tier 3 Plaintiffs characterized this attorney compensation as a "multi-million dollar bonanza" that far exceeds what they describe as a "pittance" for the pension funds themselves, particularly given their recalculation of actual new recovery.
Despite their objections to the settlement's terms, the Tier 3 Plaintiffs indicated willingness to permit court approval of the Attorney General's agreement on the condition that their separate 2021 lawsuit against the hedge funds proceeds independently. The workers' representatives framed their position as allowing the court to "approve this charade if it can stomach it," suggesting fundamental disagreement with both the settlement's structure and its characterization as a major victory for Kentucky's pension system.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.