Key Takeaways
- • Process over conviction: Leading allocators emphasize evaluating managers based on their investment process and methodology rather than short-term market views, recognizing that market perspectives shift while robust processes persist.
- • Skill versus luck distinction: A core challenge for institutional allocators involves differentiating genuine manager skill from performance driven by market timing or favorable conditions, requiring deeper due diligence beyond standard pitch presentations.
- • Structural portfolio shifts: Allocators are actively reassessing hedge fund portfolio construction due to emerging challenges including crowding in popular strategies, elevated leverage levels, and changing exposure dynamics across managers.
- • Beyond the prepared pitch: Manager selection increasingly depends on performance and decision-making demonstrated outside formal presentations, indicating allocators are demanding higher scrutiny of managers' adaptive capabilities and real-time decision quality.
- • Live discussion at Hedgeweek US Summit: The three senior allocators—George Evans (Aksia), Jackie Rosner (PAAMCO Prisma), and Paul Zummo (J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management)—will expand on these themes during the closing allocator panel scheduled for October 8 in New York.
Summary
Three prominent allocators representing major institutional investors engaged in a pre-event discussion ahead of the Hedgeweek US Summit in New York on October 8, 2026, addressing fundamental shifts in how institutional capital evaluates and constructs hedge fund portfolios. George Evans of Aksia, Jackie Rosner of PAAMCO Prisma, and Paul Zummo of J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management convened for a "Coffee Chat" focused on manager selection, due diligence protocols, and portfolio construction strategies in the current market environment.
The central thesis emerging from the allocators' discussion reflects a philosophical pivot in manager evaluation: institutional investors are increasingly prioritizing investment process over market conviction. As the conversation framed it, "Don't buy the view, buy the process. Views change, process persists." This principle addresses a persistent challenge for allocators—distinguishing between genuine alpha generation and performance derived from favorable market timing or cyclical conditions. Allocators are demanding evidence of robust, repeatable methodologies that function across market regimes rather than relying on manager performance tied to specific market outlooks.
The discussion also highlighted evolving structural concerns affecting hedge fund portfolio construction. Allocators are grappling with crowding in select strategies, management of leverage across portfolios, and shifting exposures that alter the diversification characteristics of traditional hedge fund allocations. These factors are compelling institutional investors to recalibrate portfolio architecture and manager selection criteria.
A notable theme was the inadequacy of standard pitch meetings in assessing true manager quality. Allocators indicated that meaningful differentiation emerges through evaluating how managers perform outside prepared presentations—their adaptability to market changes, decision-making under stress, and performance during unexpected conditions. This suggests institutional due diligence processes are becoming more intensive and demanding greater transparency into operational and decision-making frameworks.
The Hedgeweek US Summit will provide these three allocators a public platform to elaborate on these themes during the closing allocator panel, offering the institutional investment community direct access to perspectives on current trends in manager selection and portfolio strategy.
The central thesis emerging from the allocators' discussion reflects a philosophical pivot in manager evaluation: institutional investors are increasingly prioritizing investment process over market conviction. As the conversation framed it, "Don't buy the view, buy the process. Views change, process persists." This principle addresses a persistent challenge for allocators—distinguishing between genuine alpha generation and performance derived from favorable market timing or cyclical conditions. Allocators are demanding evidence of robust, repeatable methodologies that function across market regimes rather than relying on manager performance tied to specific market outlooks.
The discussion also highlighted evolving structural concerns affecting hedge fund portfolio construction. Allocators are grappling with crowding in select strategies, management of leverage across portfolios, and shifting exposures that alter the diversification characteristics of traditional hedge fund allocations. These factors are compelling institutional investors to recalibrate portfolio architecture and manager selection criteria.
A notable theme was the inadequacy of standard pitch meetings in assessing true manager quality. Allocators indicated that meaningful differentiation emerges through evaluating how managers perform outside prepared presentations—their adaptability to market changes, decision-making under stress, and performance during unexpected conditions. This suggests institutional due diligence processes are becoming more intensive and demanding greater transparency into operational and decision-making frameworks.
The Hedgeweek US Summit will provide these three allocators a public platform to elaborate on these themes during the closing allocator panel, offering the institutional investment community direct access to perspectives on current trends in manager selection and portfolio strategy.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.