Key Takeaways
- • Industry-wide hedge fund managers recorded a 1% loss in October, trimming year-to-date gains to 5.6%, according to research firm PivotalPath.
- • A study of 10 hedge-fund giants found their US stock portfolios overlapped more with one another than with smaller peers, and their returns had converged since 2019, with combined assets of $2.2 trillion built on just $360 billion of investor capital.
- • Elliott Management returned 2.5% through October, trailing the average competitor and the S&P 500's 11% gain, while the Nasdaq 100 sat roughly 9% below its October 6 record.
- • Multi-strategy returns show correlations of 0.97 to value-neutral funds and 0.92 to equity market-neutral funds over the year through October, indicating crowded, similar exposures.
- • Breakingviews argues that investors will eventually tire of paying for differentiation that delivers ubiquitous underperformance, and that 5 billion-dollar managers controlling 88% of hedge-fund assets as of 2025 already reflect investor preference for size.
Summary
Hedge funds are attracting capital more easily than they are standing apart from one another, according to a Reuters Breakingviews commentary by columnist Sebastian Pellejero. Industry-wide managers recorded a 1% loss in October, trimming year-to-date gains to 5.6%, per research firm PivotalPath. The column argues that managers are crowding into similar trades, leaving strategies that appear different exposed to the same swings, largely driven by the artificial intelligence boom.
The largest managers increasingly hold the same stocks. A study of 10 hedge-fund giants found that their US stock portfolios overlapped more with one another than with smaller peers, and their returns had converged since 2019. Borrowing swelled their combined assets to $2.2 trillion, against $360 billion in investor capital, which magnifies shared bets.
Even prominent funds are struggling. Elliott Management, led by Paul Singer, returned 2.5% through October according to a person familiar with the matter, trailing the average competitor and the S&P 500's 11% gain. In its latest investor letter, the firm urged patience, comparing current markets to the Roaring '20s before the Great Depression, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. Elliott manages $80 billion and uses substantially less leverage than multi-strategy firms such as Millennium Management.
The column notes that enthusiasm for AI spending pushed stocks to record highs, making patience costly. More recently, Goldman Sachs' prime brokerage desk reported $20 billion of tech-stock selling over the two weeks preceding October 26, and the Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 9% below its October 6 record. A similar pullback in July showed how quickly managers can be hurt: Situational Awareness, the AI-focused fund founded by former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, lost 67% as its holdings fell and the software stocks it had shorted rallied.
Breakingviews cites correlation data showing multi-strategy returns have closely tracked value-neutral funds (0.97) and equity market-neutral funds (0.92) over the year through October, on a scale where 1 means moving perfectly together. The column concludes that with 5 billion-dollar managers controlling 88% of hedge-fund assets as of 2025 according to PivotalPath, investors have already rewarded size, and that the industry should return more independent thinking.
The largest managers increasingly hold the same stocks. A study of 10 hedge-fund giants found that their US stock portfolios overlapped more with one another than with smaller peers, and their returns had converged since 2019. Borrowing swelled their combined assets to $2.2 trillion, against $360 billion in investor capital, which magnifies shared bets.
Even prominent funds are struggling. Elliott Management, led by Paul Singer, returned 2.5% through October according to a person familiar with the matter, trailing the average competitor and the S&P 500's 11% gain. In its latest investor letter, the firm urged patience, comparing current markets to the Roaring '20s before the Great Depression, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. Elliott manages $80 billion and uses substantially less leverage than multi-strategy firms such as Millennium Management.
The column notes that enthusiasm for AI spending pushed stocks to record highs, making patience costly. More recently, Goldman Sachs' prime brokerage desk reported $20 billion of tech-stock selling over the two weeks preceding October 26, and the Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 9% below its October 6 record. A similar pullback in July showed how quickly managers can be hurt: Situational Awareness, the AI-focused fund founded by former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, lost 67% as its holdings fell and the software stocks it had shorted rallied.
Breakingviews cites correlation data showing multi-strategy returns have closely tracked value-neutral funds (0.97) and equity market-neutral funds (0.92) over the year through October, on a scale where 1 means moving perfectly together. The column concludes that with 5 billion-dollar managers controlling 88% of hedge-fund assets as of 2025 according to PivotalPath, investors have already rewarded size, and that the industry should return more independent thinking.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.