Key Takeaways
- • The ProShares Bitcoin ETF (BITO), which holds Bitcoin futures rather than the cryptocurrency itself, returned -30.46% over the past year, trailing spot Bitcoin ETFs such as iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Fidelity Wise Origin (FBTC) by roughly $6,240 to $6,480 on a hypothetical $300,000 investment.
- • The gap is attributed mainly to roll costs from contango: BITO must sell expiring futures and buy more expensive later-dated contracts, a hidden expense not listed as a fund fee.
- • BITO's higher expense ratio and tax implications also contribute to the underperformance relative to spot products.
- • As of Nov 04, 2026, BITO traded at USD 10.22 (+0.29% on the day) against IBIT at USD 43.45 (+0.23%), with market caps of $1.49 billion and $62.36 billion respectively.
- • Investors are advised to confirm whether a Bitcoin fund holds actual coins or futures before assessing its hidden costs and tracking error.
Summary
According to a Pluang analysis published November 4, 2026, the ProShares Bitcoin ETF (BITO) returned -30.46% over the past year, trailing spot Bitcoin ETFs including iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Fidelity Wise Origin (FBTC). On a hypothetical $300,000 investment, the gap amounted to roughly $6,240 to $6,480 in favor of the spot products.
The article attributes the underperformance largely to the cost of rolling futures contracts. BITO, which invests in Bitcoin futures rather than the cryptocurrency itself, must sell expiring contracts and purchase later-dated ones at higher prices during contango, a market condition in which longer-dated futures trade above near-term contracts. This roll cost is not disclosed as a fee. Spot ETFs hold actual Bitcoin and avoid these roll costs, which the article says results in closer tracking of Bitcoin's price. BITO's higher expense ratio and tax implications were also cited as contributors to the performance gap.
As of 09:21 WIB on November 4, 2026, BITO traded at USD 10.22, up 0.29% on the day, while IBIT was priced at USD 43.45, up 0.23%. BITO's market capitalization is $1.49 billion, compared with $62.36 billion for IBIT. Pluang data show equal buy and sell activity for BITO, in contrast to predominantly buy-side interest in IBIT. Typical hold times were 36 days for BITO and 46 days for IBIT, which the article suggests may reflect investor preference for the spot product's closer tracking of Bitcoin's price.
The article recommends that investors check whether their Bitcoin fund holds physical coins or futures to understand potential hidden costs and performance differences.
The article attributes the underperformance largely to the cost of rolling futures contracts. BITO, which invests in Bitcoin futures rather than the cryptocurrency itself, must sell expiring contracts and purchase later-dated ones at higher prices during contango, a market condition in which longer-dated futures trade above near-term contracts. This roll cost is not disclosed as a fee. Spot ETFs hold actual Bitcoin and avoid these roll costs, which the article says results in closer tracking of Bitcoin's price. BITO's higher expense ratio and tax implications were also cited as contributors to the performance gap.
As of 09:21 WIB on November 4, 2026, BITO traded at USD 10.22, up 0.29% on the day, while IBIT was priced at USD 43.45, up 0.23%. BITO's market capitalization is $1.49 billion, compared with $62.36 billion for IBIT. Pluang data show equal buy and sell activity for BITO, in contrast to predominantly buy-side interest in IBIT. Typical hold times were 36 days for BITO and 46 days for IBIT, which the article suggests may reflect investor preference for the spot product's closer tracking of Bitcoin's price.
The article recommends that investors check whether their Bitcoin fund holds physical coins or futures to understand potential hidden costs and performance differences.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.