Key Takeaways
- • The SEC is weighing a FINRA-administered exam, reported to cost roughly $100.50, that would test knowledge of securities structures and investment risks as a pathway to expanding retail access to private markets, according to CNBC's Sharon Epperson and Alex Nicoll reporting.
- • The SEC has scheduled a March 4, 2026 roundtable on "responsible retailization" of private markets, with critics arguing the panel includes no retail investor representatives and several panelists from firms that offer private market products.
- • Advocates such as the ICI support broader retail access, while critics including Better Markets argue that institutional pullback is the real driver behind the push, citing private equity annualized returns of 5.8% versus 11.6% for the S&P 500 from 2022 through September 30, 2025, per MSCI data cited by The New York Times.
- • The Department of Labor has already proposed rule changes that would expand private-asset access in 401(k) plans, and the SEC is actively advancing related policies, according to publisher context.
Summary
The SEC is considering a proposed exam, administered by FINRA, that would allow individuals to qualify for access to private market investments. According to CNBC reporting by Sharon Epperson and Alex Nicoll, the test would cost roughly $100.50 and cover securities structures and investment risks. The proposal is part of a broader regulatory effort to expand retail investor access to private markets, which the SEC Investor Advisory Committee has also encouraged, particularly through registered funds.
The SEC has scheduled a roundtable for March 4, 2026, to discuss governance, valuation, and what it describes as promoting responsible retailization of private markets. Critics, including Better Markets, argue that the panel does not include retail investor representatives and that several participants represent firms that offer private market products. The Department of Labor has separately proposed rule changes that would widen private-asset access in retirement plans.
Proponents, including the Investment Company Institute, argue that retail investors should have more opportunities to invest in private markets, which institutions, endowments, and pension funds already access. Private market firms are increasingly targeting high-net-worth individuals as traditional institutional capital becomes more constrained. Opponents counter that private assets carry opacity, illiquidity, and valuation risk, and that retail investors face disadvantages relative to institutions. Figures cited by critics include Cambridge Associates data showing private equity returned an annualized 7.4% for the three years ending June 30, 2025, versus 19.7% for the S&P 500, and a Harris Poll finding that only 10% of investors are dissatisfied with current 401(k) options and want more nontraditional choices.
The debate also reflects comments from private market executives. Josh Harris, co-founder of Apollo Global Management, reportedly said the push to sell private assets to retail investors is "not going to end well." Robert Morris of Olympus Partners warned about fee layers and additional risk in funds designed for 401(k) savings. Coverage from The New York Times and Morningstar's Hal Ratner suggests the impetus stems largely from asset managers seeking new capital rather than retail demand.
The SEC has scheduled a roundtable for March 4, 2026, to discuss governance, valuation, and what it describes as promoting responsible retailization of private markets. Critics, including Better Markets, argue that the panel does not include retail investor representatives and that several participants represent firms that offer private market products. The Department of Labor has separately proposed rule changes that would widen private-asset access in retirement plans.
Proponents, including the Investment Company Institute, argue that retail investors should have more opportunities to invest in private markets, which institutions, endowments, and pension funds already access. Private market firms are increasingly targeting high-net-worth individuals as traditional institutional capital becomes more constrained. Opponents counter that private assets carry opacity, illiquidity, and valuation risk, and that retail investors face disadvantages relative to institutions. Figures cited by critics include Cambridge Associates data showing private equity returned an annualized 7.4% for the three years ending June 30, 2025, versus 19.7% for the S&P 500, and a Harris Poll finding that only 10% of investors are dissatisfied with current 401(k) options and want more nontraditional choices.
The debate also reflects comments from private market executives. Josh Harris, co-founder of Apollo Global Management, reportedly said the push to sell private assets to retail investors is "not going to end well." Robert Morris of Olympus Partners warned about fee layers and additional risk in funds designed for 401(k) savings. Coverage from The New York Times and Morningstar's Hal Ratner suggests the impetus stems largely from asset managers seeking new capital rather than retail demand.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.