Key Takeaways
- • Active ETFs and semi-liquid alternatives are reshaping European fund rankings, with equity ETF providers recording their best performance to date, driven by European investors' emphasis on "appealing investment strategy" over passive approaches.
- • BlackRock retains global number one position but faces accelerating regional pressure from JPMorgan, which has claimed top rankings in Germany, Italy, Sweden, and Switzerland, while BlackRock dropped to fourth in France behind Natixis, Pictet, and Amundi—signaling a potential leadership shift by 2026.
- • ESG-focused asset managers Robeco and Nordea experienced brand perception declines as "greenhushing" gained traction across the industry amid political backlash and regulatory concerns over sustainability claims, reversing prior momentum in ESG investing.
- • Top five fund brands remain unchanged overall, but the remainder of the top 10 saw major reshuffling, with passive specialists climbing rankings and new entrants emerging, while active managers like Baillie Gifford and Artemis gained ground despite challenging market conditions.
- • Fee compression, geopolitical turbulence, and resource constraints in 2024 forced asset managers to pivot toward diversified business models, with the best-performing brands those that expanded into active ETFs and alternatives rather than relying solely on traditional active mutual funds.
Summary
Broadridge's 2025 Fund Brand 50 report reveals a significant structural shift in how European asset managers are competing and gaining market share. Active ETFs and semi-liquid alternatives are no longer niche offerings—they have become central to brand positioning and investor demand. The research indicates that European institutional and professional selectors weighted "appealing investment strategy" more heavily than peers in the US and Asia Pacific, creating tailwinds for active ETF adoption and equity ETF providers, which posted their strongest performance to date in 2024.
BlackRock's global dominance remains intact, but regional fractures signal vulnerability. JPMorgan's aggressive positioning across key European markets—winning outright in Germany and Italy, and ranking ahead of BlackRock in Sweden and Switzerland—reflects both the US bank's product innovation and BlackRock's potential complacency. In France, BlackRock's slip to fourth position, behind Natixis, Pictet, and Amundi, underscores the geographic fragmentation of European asset management. The report explicitly flags a possible leadership transition by 2026, suggesting that current competitive dynamics could fundamentally restructure the European fund ranking hierarchy within 12 months.
The reshuffling within the top 10 reveals divergent winners and losers. Passive specialists have climbed, while new entrants have emerged to challenge incumbents. Active managers including Baillie Gifford and Artemis posted gains despite challenging conditions, likely due to successful positioning in active ETFs and alternatives. In sharp contrast, ESG-focused providers Robeco and Nordea experienced measurable brand perception declines. The report attributes this decline to rising "greenhushing," in which asset managers have deliberately reduced sustainability messaging to mitigate exposure to political backlash and legal scrutiny—a material reversal from the ESG momentum that propelled these firms in prior years.
The broader context reveals an industry under significant pressure. 2024 presented multiple headwinds: geopolitical turbulence, persistent fee compression, and resource constraints that forced strategic rethinking across the sector. The winners in the FB50 rankings have been those that diversified beyond traditional active mutual funds into higher-growth segments like active ETFs and semi-liquid alternatives. This divergence suggests that passive-only and ESG-concentrated strategies are no longer sufficient differentiators in a competitive landscape increasingly defined by product innovation, fee efficiency, and portfolio diversification.
BlackRock's global dominance remains intact, but regional fractures signal vulnerability. JPMorgan's aggressive positioning across key European markets—winning outright in Germany and Italy, and ranking ahead of BlackRock in Sweden and Switzerland—reflects both the US bank's product innovation and BlackRock's potential complacency. In France, BlackRock's slip to fourth position, behind Natixis, Pictet, and Amundi, underscores the geographic fragmentation of European asset management. The report explicitly flags a possible leadership transition by 2026, suggesting that current competitive dynamics could fundamentally restructure the European fund ranking hierarchy within 12 months.
The reshuffling within the top 10 reveals divergent winners and losers. Passive specialists have climbed, while new entrants have emerged to challenge incumbents. Active managers including Baillie Gifford and Artemis posted gains despite challenging conditions, likely due to successful positioning in active ETFs and alternatives. In sharp contrast, ESG-focused providers Robeco and Nordea experienced measurable brand perception declines. The report attributes this decline to rising "greenhushing," in which asset managers have deliberately reduced sustainability messaging to mitigate exposure to political backlash and legal scrutiny—a material reversal from the ESG momentum that propelled these firms in prior years.
The broader context reveals an industry under significant pressure. 2024 presented multiple headwinds: geopolitical turbulence, persistent fee compression, and resource constraints that forced strategic rethinking across the sector. The winners in the FB50 rankings have been those that diversified beyond traditional active mutual funds into higher-growth segments like active ETFs and semi-liquid alternatives. This divergence suggests that passive-only and ESG-concentrated strategies are no longer sufficient differentiators in a competitive landscape increasingly defined by product innovation, fee efficiency, and portfolio diversification.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.