Key Takeaways
- • The Hong Kong Government has proposed Committee Stage Amendments to the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Preferential Tax Regimes for Funds, Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles and Carried Interest) Bill 2026, which was gazetted on 12 June 2026, to refine the enhanced tax concession for family-owned investment holding vehicles (FIHVs).
- • KPMG characterises the refinements and clarifications as a welcome development that should make the family office regime more attractive and practical for existing and prospective family offices in Hong Kong.
- • KPMG cautions that families should not evaluate Hong Kong tax implications in isolation, and that overseas exposures, including potential Chinese Mainland tax liabilities, require coordinated cross-border review.
- • The fund and carried interest concessions are addressed separately in a companion KPMG tax alert, so this alert covers FIHV-specific changes only.
Summary
The Hong Kong SAR Government has proposed a series of amendments to draft legislation that would enhance tax concessions for funds, carried interest and family-owned investment holding vehicles (FIHVs), according to a KPMG tax alert (Hong Kong SAR Tax Alert, Issue 19, November 2026). The clarifications also address how the enhanced concessions apply in practice.
The underlying Bill, the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Preferential Tax Regimes for Funds, Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles and Carried Interest) Bill 2026, was gazetted on 12 June 2026 and set out detailed legislative provisions for the enhanced concessions. Following submissions from KPMG and other stakeholders, the Government has proposed numerous Committee Stage Amendments (CSAs) and issued responses to industry feedback on the FIHV concession.
KPMG's review focuses on the FIHV amendments and clarifications, which the firm says are designed to broaden the scope of qualifying investments and improve the regime's usability. KPMG describes these refinements as a welcome development, noting they should make the regime more attractive and practical for existing family offices and for those planning to establish a presence in Hong Kong, while providing greater clarity on scope and application.
KPMG also stresses that families should assess the wider overseas tax implications of proposed family asset-holding structures, including any potential Chinese Mainland tax exposure. In its view, cross-border structuring decisions still require coordinated review of the regulatory and tax rules in every relevant jurisdiction. The alert references a Monetary Authority of Singapore circular issued in July 2026 on tax incentive schemes for funds, which is cited as related context rather than as part of the Hong Kong proposals.
The underlying Bill, the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Preferential Tax Regimes for Funds, Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles and Carried Interest) Bill 2026, was gazetted on 12 June 2026 and set out detailed legislative provisions for the enhanced concessions. Following submissions from KPMG and other stakeholders, the Government has proposed numerous Committee Stage Amendments (CSAs) and issued responses to industry feedback on the FIHV concession.
KPMG's review focuses on the FIHV amendments and clarifications, which the firm says are designed to broaden the scope of qualifying investments and improve the regime's usability. KPMG describes these refinements as a welcome development, noting they should make the regime more attractive and practical for existing family offices and for those planning to establish a presence in Hong Kong, while providing greater clarity on scope and application.
KPMG also stresses that families should assess the wider overseas tax implications of proposed family asset-holding structures, including any potential Chinese Mainland tax exposure. In its view, cross-border structuring decisions still require coordinated review of the regulatory and tax rules in every relevant jurisdiction. The alert references a Monetary Authority of Singapore circular issued in July 2026 on tax incentive schemes for funds, which is cited as related context rather than as part of the Hong Kong proposals.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.