Key Takeaways
- • Four New York City public pension funds filed a lawsuit on February 17, 2026, seeking a court order requiring AT&T to hold a shareholder vote on a workforce diversity disclosure proposal at its 2026 annual meeting.
- • The funds allege AT&T violated federal securities law by omitting the proposal from its 2026 proxy materials, effectively blocking the shareholder vote.
- • AT&T cited a new SEC policy on shareholder votes as the basis for excluding the proposal, according to the funds.
- • Following the filing, AT&T reversed course and agreed to include the proposal, according to publisher reporting, resolving the dispute before a court ruling.
Summary
Four New York City pension funds sued AT&T on February 17, 2026, asking a court to compel a shareholder vote on a proposal requesting disclosure of workforce demographics at the telecommunications company's 2026 annual meeting. The funds argue that AT&T's omission of the proposal from its 2026 proxy materials violated federal securities law and effectively denied investors a vote on the issue.
According to the funds' complaint, AT&T justified excluding the proposal by citing a new SEC policy on shareholder votes. The requested disclosure centers on EEO-1 workforce data, which the company's filing indicated neither prevents nor discourages AT&T from reporting its diversity and inclusion commitments, a point the funds used to challenge the exclusion.
Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, AT&T reversed its position. Publisher reporting describes the company as agreeing to put the New York City funds' diversity proposal before shareholders, and the dispute was reported as settled, with the proposal set to proceed to a vote.
The case reflects continued institutional investor scrutiny of workforce diversity disclosure and of how companies apply shareholder proposal exclusion rules under evolving SEC policy. For asset owners and governance professionals, the episode illustrates that public pension funds will litigate to preserve their ability to file shareholder proposals when they believe companies have improperly excluded them.
According to the funds' complaint, AT&T justified excluding the proposal by citing a new SEC policy on shareholder votes. The requested disclosure centers on EEO-1 workforce data, which the company's filing indicated neither prevents nor discourages AT&T from reporting its diversity and inclusion commitments, a point the funds used to challenge the exclusion.
Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, AT&T reversed its position. Publisher reporting describes the company as agreeing to put the New York City funds' diversity proposal before shareholders, and the dispute was reported as settled, with the proposal set to proceed to a vote.
The case reflects continued institutional investor scrutiny of workforce diversity disclosure and of how companies apply shareholder proposal exclusion rules under evolving SEC policy. For asset owners and governance professionals, the episode illustrates that public pension funds will litigate to preserve their ability to file shareholder proposals when they believe companies have improperly excluded them.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.