Key Takeaways
- • IFSCA issued a circular dated 25 September 2026 establishing a framework for differential distribution in Venture Capital Schemes and Restricted Schemes operating in the GIFT International Financial Services Centre (IFSC).
- • Under the framework, Fund Management Entities (FMEs) may issue multiple unit classes, including senior and junior units, carrying differential distribution rights, enabling blended finance structures.
- • Only Venture Capital Schemes and Restricted (non-retail) Schemes are permissible under the framework, which departs from the pro-rata, pari-passu distribution principle that traditionally governs AIFs.
- • The framework follows a consultation paper seeking public comment on permitting differential distribution under Parts A and B of Chapter III of the IFSCA (Fund Management) Regulations, 2025.
Summary
The International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) has issued a circular dated 25 September 2026 establishing a Framework for Differential Distribution in Venture Capital Schemes and Restricted Schemes in the IFSC, according to the regulator's press release and published circular. The framework allows Fund Management Entities to issue senior and junior unit classes with differential distribution rights, letting investors within a single fund take different levels of risk and return, according to multiple summaries of the circular.
The measure builds on a prior consultation paper that proposed facilitating blended finance and other fund structures by permitting differential distribution in these scheme categories. Under the Fund Management Regulations, 2025, Venture Capital Schemes and Restricted (Non-Retail) Schemes are together treated as Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) open to accredited investors or investors above a specified investment threshold. As of June 30, 2025, 177 FMEs were registered with IFSCA, having launched 272 schemes with commitments of USD 22.11 billion and cumulative investments exceeding USD 11 billion, about 85% of which were channelled to India.
The consultation paper cited the rationale for the change: AIFs have traditionally distributed proceeds pro rata and pari passu, but blended finance structures require flexibility, such as first-loss capital, guarantees, or priority distribution, to mobilise private capital alongside concessional funding. Cited structures include classes bearing higher portfolio losses, accepting lower or zero financial returns, or units issued against grants. The paper referenced global blended finance data from Convergence, which put cumulative mobilised capital at roughly USD 262 billion in developing countries, and noted that IFSCA had received industry representations seeking multiple unit classes across all AIFs.
Sources available for this summary are limited to headlines, snippets, and consultation material; the full circular text was not retrieved, so specific eligibility conditions and operational requirements are not detailed here.
The measure builds on a prior consultation paper that proposed facilitating blended finance and other fund structures by permitting differential distribution in these scheme categories. Under the Fund Management Regulations, 2025, Venture Capital Schemes and Restricted (Non-Retail) Schemes are together treated as Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) open to accredited investors or investors above a specified investment threshold. As of June 30, 2025, 177 FMEs were registered with IFSCA, having launched 272 schemes with commitments of USD 22.11 billion and cumulative investments exceeding USD 11 billion, about 85% of which were channelled to India.
The consultation paper cited the rationale for the change: AIFs have traditionally distributed proceeds pro rata and pari passu, but blended finance structures require flexibility, such as first-loss capital, guarantees, or priority distribution, to mobilise private capital alongside concessional funding. Cited structures include classes bearing higher portfolio losses, accepting lower or zero financial returns, or units issued against grants. The paper referenced global blended finance data from Convergence, which put cumulative mobilised capital at roughly USD 262 billion in developing countries, and noted that IFSCA had received industry representations seeking multiple unit classes across all AIFs.
Sources available for this summary are limited to headlines, snippets, and consultation material; the full circular text was not retrieved, so specific eligibility conditions and operational requirements are not detailed here.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.