The USPTO Director denied a patent owner’s request for discretionary denial of two inter partes review (IPR) petitions, citing the petitioner’s “well-settled expectation” that it would not be accused of infringing the two challenged patents. The Director’s conclusion was based on the petitioner’s decade-long business relationship with the original owner of the challenged patents.
The patents-at-issue cover “infotainment” products used in vehicles, which the original patent owner had been supplyi...
Continue Reading
Sign up for FREE to read the full article and access 132K+ alternative investment headlines.
Alternative Investment News