In an ANDA litigation, the District of Delaware recently denied the plaintiffs’ motion to strike portions of the defendants’ expert reports and related deposition testimony. Although the defendants’ invalidity contentions did not state the specific theories of invalidity upon which the expert opined, the court found that none of the Pennypack factors supported excluding that expert testimony.
During discovery, the defendants served final invalidity contentions followed three months later by an o...
Continue Reading
Sign up for FREE to read the full article and access 131K+ alternative investment headlines.
Alternative Investment News