Key Takeaways
- • The Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) has reportedly urged limited partner advisory committee (LPAC) members to scrutinize continuation vehicle transactions rather than routinely approving conflict-of-interest disclosures, according to a Financial Times report.
- • Continuation vehicles accounted for roughly one-fifth of private equity exits last year, underscoring the growing scale of GP-led secondary transactions.
- • ILPA flagged conflicts among LPAC members who invest in both traditional buyout funds and continuation vehicles, creating potential divergence of interests.
- • Hamilton Lane, HarbourVest and Partners Group were named as firms operating across both traditional and continuation vehicle strategies; none has been accused of wrongdoing.
Summary
Major institutional investors are calling for stronger oversight of private equity continuation vehicle transactions, amid concerns that fund governance committees are not adequately challenging potential conflicts of interest, according to a report by the Financial Times. The Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA), which represents some of the world's largest private equity investors, has reportedly issued guidance urging members of limited partner advisory committees (LPACs) to scrutinize transactions in which fund managers sell portfolio companies to newly established vehicles under their own management.
The guidance comes as continuation vehicles have grown rapidly. According to the report, these vehicles accounted for approximately one-fifth of private equity exits last year, as buyout firms increasingly retain portfolio companies rather than pursue traditional sales. ILPA reportedly warned that committee members should be sufficiently experienced and prepared to challenge fund managers, rather than routinely approving disclosures relating to potential conflicts.
The association also highlighted conflicts among LPAC members themselves, particularly where institutions invest in both traditional buyout funds and continuation vehicles. Firms including Hamilton Lane, HarbourVest and Partners Group operate strategies across both segments, although none has been accused of wrongdoing. Concerns have reportedly emerged that some investors sitting on governance committees may have financial interests in continuation vehicles acquiring assets at lower valuations, potentially conflicting with the interests of selling fund investors.
ILPA's guidance follows earlier concerns raised by institutional investors over the effectiveness of LPAC oversight, including cases where committee representatives attend meetings without adequate preparation or delegate responsibilities to less experienced staff. The recommendations reflect growing pressure for stronger governance as GP-led secondaries become an increasingly important source of liquidity for private equity managers and their investors.
The guidance comes as continuation vehicles have grown rapidly. According to the report, these vehicles accounted for approximately one-fifth of private equity exits last year, as buyout firms increasingly retain portfolio companies rather than pursue traditional sales. ILPA reportedly warned that committee members should be sufficiently experienced and prepared to challenge fund managers, rather than routinely approving disclosures relating to potential conflicts.
The association also highlighted conflicts among LPAC members themselves, particularly where institutions invest in both traditional buyout funds and continuation vehicles. Firms including Hamilton Lane, HarbourVest and Partners Group operate strategies across both segments, although none has been accused of wrongdoing. Concerns have reportedly emerged that some investors sitting on governance committees may have financial interests in continuation vehicles acquiring assets at lower valuations, potentially conflicting with the interests of selling fund investors.
ILPA's guidance follows earlier concerns raised by institutional investors over the effectiveness of LPAC oversight, including cases where committee representatives attend meetings without adequate preparation or delegate responsibilities to less experienced staff. The recommendations reflect growing pressure for stronger governance as GP-led secondaries become an increasingly important source of liquidity for private equity managers and their investors.
Go deeper than the headline
Research every firm in this story, track the ones that matter and get the daily briefing — free for 7 days.